Minotauromachy/Minotauromachie: A young girl, holding flowers, shines a dim light on a beast that is partly human. The beast has stretched its hand out toward the light. Blocking the light? Figures from above, two women with birds, a man climbing a ladder, and a face in the far wall, are observing the scene. Below, between the girl and the monster, a woman and a horse ( a human and an animal) are suffering.
Minotaur Caressing the Hand of a Sleeping Woman with His Muzzle: A naked beast is straddling a sleeping woman in her bed. The implications are sexually powerful.
Historically, the image of the Minotaur represents violence. The story weaves back through time and grows out of the prehistoric practice of human sacrifice, both of young men and young women, performed traditionally by a priest disguised in a bull-headed mask and includes references to sexual relations between a beast and a woman, producing the bull-headed man or man-headed bull in different depictions.
I’ve heard it said that, at some level, all art is self-portrait. Every time I think about that, I think about my own recent frenzy of painting, and decide that can only be true at some certain but undetermined skill level. So, in my own life, I would grant the assumption more credibility when it refers to my writing than my painting at this time. But, the development of self-expression is a major goal that I am consciously trying to develop in my painting. I grant the assumption.
Picasso is the master craftsman. His work does, consistently pop and make me pay attention, even though I have often been left somewhat confused about the exact reason for my reactions. This time, regarding these works from the LACMA exhibition, Picasso and Rivera: Conversations Across Time, the implications are clear, and disturbing.