Vision is one of my favorite things to think about, both in the sense of seeing as well as understanding. Those two things, of course, are related to each other, and at some level, seeing and understanding are the same thing.
One time I saw an armadillo on the street where I live. Since I live in Minnesota and armadillos don’t, I honed in as I approached the animal in my car. That particular armadillo turned out to be a rusty bucket. Learning and judgement are essential aspects of vision, as well as the shapes and colors we physically see. My state of mind effects what I see, recognize, and remember. I am inclined to expect the likely and evaluate the unlikely.
The Twentieth Century Catholic priest and spiritual writer, Henri Nouwen, died en route to The Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, Russia. He wanted another chance to see his favorite painting, The Return of the Prodigal Son. Nouwen was surprised and pleased by what he discovered in Rembrandt’s portrayal of God in the figure of the father in that painting.The Dutch artist, M. C. Escher’s work was powerfully influenced by the intricate Moorish tile work he saw at The Alhambra in Granada, Spain.
Someone I know in Minnesota also traveled to Spain, specifically to see his favorite painting, Heironymus Bosch’s, The Garden of Earthly Delights. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/The_Garden_of_Earthly_Delights_by_Bosch_High_Resolution_2.jpg. Similarities exist between that painting and Bruegel’s Fall of the Rebel Angels.
Last year someone asked me if I had considered why I keep making art pilgrimages, and I have been thinking about that question since then. The answer is connected to the reason I continue to like Pieter Bruegel’s painting. The answer is also connected to why I like to think about seeing and the art of understanding. Artists have always recorded both the accepted and alternate personal and world views. Isn’t that intriguing? Isn’t that worth considering?
Detail from Buegel’s, Fall of the Rebel Angels